CPQ Microbiology (2018) 1:5
Research Article

Shifts in Gut Microbe Population in Periparturient Goats


Kingsley Ekwemalor1, Emmanuel Asiamah1, Eboghoye Eluka-Okoludoh1, Bharath Mulakala2, Sarah Adjei-Fremah2 & Mulumebet Worku2*

1Department of Applied Sciences and Technology, North Carolina A&T State University, USA
2Department of Animal Sciences, North Carolina A&T State University, USA

*Correspondence to: Dr. Mulumebet Worku, Department of Animal Sciences, North Carolina A&T State University, USA.

Copyright © 2018 Dr. Mulumebet Worku, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: 03 October 2018
Published: 25 October 2018

Keywords: Gut Microbe; Microbial DNA; PCR


Abstract

Many factors influence the gut microbiome. The gastrointestinal tract of goats is inhabited by diverse and complex microbial communities including bacteria, protozoa, fungi, archaea, and viruses. This study investigated the shifts in the bacterial community during the periparturient period. Fecal samples were collected from Five BoerXSpanish goats at 14 days and 7 days before and after parturition. Fecal DNA was isolated using the QIAamp (R) DNA isolation stool mini kit. The Nanodrop spectrophotometer was used to determine the concentration and purity of microbial DNA. Fecal samples were amplified using RT-PCR to determine the presence of total microbial DNA and relative abundance of Bifidobacteria spp and Lactobacillus spp. The housekeeping genes GAPDH and β-actin were used to normalize the data. Relative abundance was calculated using the Livak method were samples taken from 2 weeks before kidding served as the control group. Bifidobacteria, Lactobacillus, and 16S primers detected microbial DNA in fecal samples. There was an increase in Bifidobacteria, and Lactobacillus 7 days before kidding. Gut microbial diversity changes in periparturient goats.

Introduction
Shifts in ruminal bacteria are considered to be beneficial to feed efficiency during the peripartal period [1]. The periparturient period is defined as the period from 3 weeks prepartum to 3 weeks postpartum [2,3]. Immunomodulatory properties of Bifidobacterium and the mechanisms and molecular players underlying these processes have implications for animal health [4,5]. The gastrointestinal tract of goats is colonized by a complex microbial community. Diverse microbiota such as bacteria, archaea, protozoa, and fungi play a role in the host’s nutrient uptake and energy metabolism in ruminants [6]. Lactobacillus is a gram-positive bacterial species inhabiting the gastrointestinal tract of vertebrates [7]. Although greatly outnumbered by anaerobic bacterial species in the intestinal tract, lactobacilli are often detected in fecal samples [8]. Bifidobacterium is among the first microbes to colonize the gastrointestinal tract and are believed to exert positive health benefits on their host [9]. Previous studies have shown their use as probiotics especially in dairy products [10,11].

Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, are commonly used as probiotics in functional foods and animal feed [12,13]. These species have been shown to protect against enteric infection [4]. The objective of this study was to evaluate the shifts in the bacterial community in goat feces during the periparturient period.

Materials and Methods

Animals and Housing
Five female BoerXSpanish goats were used from North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University Farm according to the guiding principles for the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC ID: 15-006.0).

Collection of Samples
Fecal samples were collected and evaluated once a week throughout the experiment.

Isolation of Microbial DNA
The QIAamp (R) DNA isolation stool mini kit (QIAGEN Sciences, Maryland) was used to isolate DNA from fecal samples as recommended by the manufacturer. The concentration (260nm) and quality or purity (260/280nm) of the isolated DNA samples were determined using the Nanodrop Spectrophotometer 1000 3.7.1 (Thermo Scientific Inc., MA).

Amplification of Microbial DNA Using PCR
DNA isolated from the fecal samples was amplified using PCR to determine the presence of total microbial DNA and relative abundance of Bifidobacteria spp and Lactobacillus spp. The GAPDH gene was used as a housekeeping gene and for normalizing data. Specific primers for the amplification of variable regions of 16S rRNA gene for Bifidobacteria spp and Lactobacillus spp were used (Table 1).

PCR was done using the CFX Connect Real-time system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., USA) [14]. Amplification consisted of one cycle of 95ºC (10 minutes), 40 cycles of denaturation at 95ºC (15s) and annealing/extension at 60ºC (1minute) [15,16] in the CFX Connect Real-time system (BIO-RAD Laboratories, Hercules, CA)

Table 1: The sequence of bacteria primers used.


Results

DNA Concentration and Purity
The lowest concentration of DNA in goat fecal samples was isolated during the periods one week before and one week after kidding. The concentration of isolated DNA ranged from 9.8ng/μl to 51ng/μl. The highest concentration was observed 2-weeks before kidding. The lowest concentration was observed 1-week after kidding.


Figure 1: DNA concentration during the periparturient period in goats. A - After, B - Before

Microbial DNA
The relative abundance of total microbe (16S), Bifidobacterium spp and Lactobacillus spp changed during the periparturient period. The relative abundance was high for Bifidobacterium spp and Lactobacillus spp 7 days before kidding.

Table 2: Relative abundance of Bifidobacterium spp and Lactobacillus spp over six (6) Weeks around the periparturient period

A – After, B – Before

Discussion
Understanding the shifts in bacterial communities in goats during the periparturient period is very important. The gastrointestinal tract is colonized by a diverse array of microflora which may be detrimental or beneficial to the host. Bifidobacteria and lactobacillus bacteria have been found in ruminant fecal samples and used as probiotics for improved production and have also been used to monitor food safety for mutton and other products [17]. In our study, both Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus were present in goat feces, and their abundance varied during the periparturient period. Previous studies conducted by [14] reported the expression of both Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus in sheep during the periparturient period. This result corroborates with the result from our study.

Our results also show an increased population of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus 7 days before kidding. It has been shown that oral administration of Lactobacillus casei activated immune cells of the innate immune response and increased the expression of innate immune receptor, TLR2 [21]. In ruminants, the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus have been shown to amend E. coli induced inflammation in primary bovine mammary epithelial cells. Results from this study may suggest the need to study the role of shifts in Bifidobacteria and lactobacillus on host health and well-being during the peripartal period.

Conclusion
Both Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus were present in goat feces, and their abundance varied during the periparturient period. Further studies are needed to determine the association to innate immunity during this period. Detection of fecal microbes in goats may be affected by the period of sampling.

Bibliography

  1. Elolimy, A. A., Arroyo, J. M., Batistel, F., Iakiviak, M. A. & Loor, J. J. (2018). Association of residual feed intake with abundance of ruminal bacteria and biopolymer hydrolyzing enzyme activities during the peripartal period and early lactation in Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 9(1), 43.
  2. Aleri, J., Hine, B., Pyman, M., Mansell, P., Wales, W., Mallard, B. & Fisher, A. (2016). Periparturient immunosuppression and strategies to improve dairy cow health during the periparturient period. Research in Veterinary Science, 108, 8-17.
  3. Sordillo, L. M., Contreras, G. & Aitken, S. L. (2009). Metabolic factors affecting the inflammatory response of periparturient dairy cows. Animal Health Research Reviews, 10(1), 53-63.
  4. Adjei-Fremah, S., Ekwemalor, K., Asiamah, E. K., Ismail, H., Ibrahim, S. & Worku, M. (2018). Effect of probiotic supplementation on growth and global gene expression in dairy cows. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 46(1), 257-263.
  5. Ekwemalor, K., Asiamah, E., Osei, B., Ismail, H. & Worku, M. (2017). Evaluation of the Effect of Probiotic Administration on Gene Expression in Goat Blood. Journal of Molecular Biology Research, 7(1), 88.
  6. Belanche, A., Doreau, M., Edwards, J. E., Moorby, J. M., Pinloche, E. & Newbold, C. J. (2012). Shifts in the Rumen Microbiota Due to the Type of Carbohydrate and Level of Protein Ingested by Dairy Cattle Are Associated with Changes in Rumen Fermentation. The Journal of Nutrition, 142(9), 1684-1692.
  7. Sequeira, S., Kavanaugh, D., MacKenzie, D. A., Šuligoj, T., Walpole, S., et al. (2018). Structural basis for the role of serine-rich repeat proteins from Lactobacillus reuteri in gut microbe-host interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
  8. Tannock, G., Munro, K., Harmsen, H., Welling, G., Smart, J. & Gopal, P. (2000). Analysis of the fecal microflora of human subjects consuming a probiotic product containing Lactobacillus rhamnosusDR20. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66(6), 2578-2588.
  9. O'Callaghan, A. & van Sinderen, D. (2016). Bifidobacteria and their role as members of the human gut microbiota. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 925.
  10. Ju, Y., Hou, N., Meng, J., Wang, X., Zhang, X., Zhao, D., et al. (2010). T cell immunoglobulin-and mucin-domain-containing molecule-3 (Tim-3) mediates natural killer cell suppression in chronic hepatitis B. Journal of Hepatology, 52(3), 322-329.
  11. Vinderola, C. & Reinheimer, J. (2003). Lactic acid starter and probiotic bacteria: a comparative “in vitro” study of probiotic characteristics and biological barrier resistance. Food Research International, 36(9-10), 895-904.
  12. Gaggìa, F., Mattarelli, P. & Biavati, B. (2010). Probiotics and prebiotics in animal feeding for safe food production. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 141, S15-S28.
  13. Gyawali, R. & Ibrahim, S. A. (2012). Impact of plant derivatives on the growth of foodborne pathogens and the functionality of probiotics. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 95(1), 29-45.
  14. Osei, B. (2017). Evaluation of Galectin Gene Expression During the Periparturient Period and After Modulation in St. Croix Sheep. North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University
  15. Delroisse, J. M., Boulvin, A. L., Parmentier, I., Dauphin, R. D., Vandenbol, M. & Portetelle, D. (2008). Quantification of Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp. in rat fecal samples by real-time PCR. Microbiological Research, 163(6), 663-670.
  16. Wu, Z., Liu, Q., Li, Z., Cheng, W., Sun, J., Guo, Z., et al. (2018). Environmental factors shaping the diversity of bacterial communities that promote rice production. BMC Microbiology, 18(1), 51.
  17. Nakamura, K., Deyama, Y., Yoshimura, Y., Hashimoto, M., Kaga, M., Suzuki, K. & Yawaka, Y. (2011). Tannin-fluoride preparation attenuates prostaglandin E2 production by dental pulp cells. Molecular Medicine Reports, 4(4), 641-644.
  18. Ekwemalor, K., Adjei-Fremah, S., Asiamah, E., Eluka-Okoludoh, E., Osei, B. & Worku, M. (2018). Systemic expression of galectin genes in periparturient goats. Small Ruminant Research, 168, 60-68.
  19. Yang, H. Y., Liu, S. L., Ibrahim, S. A., Zhao, L., Jiang, J. L., Sun, W. F. & Ren, F. Z. (2009). Oral administration of live Bifidobacterium substrains isolated from healthy centenarians enhanced immune function in BALB/c mice. Nutrition Research, 29(4), 281-289.

Total Articles Published

8
9
2


Total Citations:

1
8
4




Highlights


Cient Periodique is a ‘Gold’ open access publisher that aspires to offer absolute free, unrestricted access to the valuable research information

We welcome all the eminent authors to submit your valuable paper

Cient Periodique invites the participation of honourable Editors and Authors

CPQ Journals provide Certificates for publication

Cient Periodique also offers memberships for potential Authors

Best Articles will be appreciated with the provision of corresponding Certificate

Hi!

We're here to answer your questions!


Send us a message via Whatsapp, and we'll reply the moment we're available!